Capability

Turn regulatory, privacy and emerging AI-risk expectations into owned controls and reviewable evidence.

Cybersecurity governance, risk and compliance (GRC), privacy and AI risk programmes connect obligations with control ownership, assessment and evidence for management review.

Shape a programme
Two leaders review an assurance map connecting obligations, ownership, control design, evidence, testing, deficiencies, remediation, exceptions and management review.

Who it helps

Is this relevant to your team?

Risk, privacy, compliance and technology leaders coordinating controls and evidence.

Governance: Ownership and decisions; Privacy: Personal-data responsibilities; AI risk: Use-case review and oversight. Owned controls and reviewable evidence.

Problems addressed

What needs attention

Policies, privacy obligations and AI risks can sit with different owners. Connect each requirement to a control, an accountable team and reviewable evidence.

  • Obligation and control mapping
  • Policy and operating-model design

    An information security management system (ISMS) connects security risks, policies, controls and accountable owners. ISO/IEC 27001 implementation support can include defining scope, assessing gaps and risks, planning risk treatment, and preparing the Statement of Applicability.

  • Data and AI-risk assessment
  • Evidence and improvement roadmap

    Establish evidence for internal audit and management review, with agreed owners and follow-up actions. The work supports a managed improvement programme and preparation for independent certification assessment; it does not guarantee certification.

Expected outputs

What the engagement can produce

Outputs are selected and agreed for your scope. They describe planned deliverables, not completed customer work.

Obligation and control map

Question answered
What should this make clear?
Typical contents
Connect in-scope requirements with existing controls and owners.
Intended user
Risk, privacy, compliance and technology leaders coordinating controls and evidence.
Decision enabled
Agree ownership and the next action.

Risk and evidence review

Question answered
What should this make clear?
Typical contents
Identify data or AI risks, control gaps and missing evidence.
Intended user
Risk, privacy, compliance and technology leaders coordinating controls and evidence.
Decision enabled
Agree ownership and the next action.

Improvement roadmap

Question answered
What should this make clear?
Typical contents
Prioritise actions, responsibilities and management review points.
Intended user
Risk, privacy, compliance and technology leaders coordinating controls and evidence.
Decision enabled
Agree ownership and the next action.

Next step

Start with your context

Bring the requirements in scope, existing policies and unresolved ownership questions.

Shape a programme

Relevant contexts

Where this requirement appears

The same capability can serve different operating contexts. The starting point remains the requirement.

Related reading

Questions to resolve before delivery

Use these practical notes to sharpen the requirement and the next decision.

Next step

Shape a programme

Bring the requirement, constraint or unresolved decision. We will help structure what comes next.

Shape a programme